As I’ve
said before, it’s hard for a sitcom to win me over. This was the case for ABC’s The Goldbergs which debuted this
fall. As a product of the 80s, I was
excited to see this much-promoted show packed full of 80s fads (rubik’s cubes,
big hair, VCRs). Although I only
remember the later years of the decade with any real detail, the decade has
always held a special place in my heart.
(I’ve always been a bit slow to let go of eras. I was still listening to Madonna records, yes
records, on my Fisher Price record player well into the alternative rock
movement of the 90s). So in love with
80s memorabilia, I once tried to purchase VHS’s “I Love the 80s” miniseries
(only to find out it wasn’t for sale, big marketing error on their part). So, I tuned into the first episode.
I
enjoyed being transported back to the 80s with glimpses of television shows
(Luke & Laura’s wedding on General
Hospital), films (Ghost Busters),
and toys I remembered (He Man), but for some reason the first two episodes of
the show didn’t hook me the way that I thought they would. At the heart of the show is, quite obviously,
the Goldberg family and although no one character or relationship bothered me,
none drew me in especially either. So
the series sat on my DVR for most of the fall.
But as 2013 drew to a close and my DVR queue dwindled down, I decided to
give the show another chance and it was in this second attempt that I grew fond
of it and started to appreciate how the show was operating.
What I
realized as I watched the middle episodes of the first season was that it felt
very different than the other sitcoms on at the present and that had nothing to
do with the historical backdrop. Or,
maybe, in a way, it did. What I finally realized
was that it sort of felt like watching a 1980s sitcom in that it wasn’t as
fast-paced and cynical as most sitcoms on today; it was instead heartwarming
and positive (and even touchy-feely) in a way that reminded me of the great
family sitcoms of the 80s: Full House, Who’s the Boss, Growing Pains, etc. While it is a staple of the sitcom to rest
individual episodes around a familial problem that will be resolved by the
episode’s end, this show almost always ends that familial problem with an
emotional scene. And more importantly,
added emotion (and nostalgia) comes right before the credits roll.
The
premise behind the fictional series is that Adam Goldberg, the youngest child
of three, is narrating his childhood as an adult. A video enthusiast, he follows his family
around incessantly shooting home videos.
The reality behind the series is that it was actually created by the
real Adam Goldberg who did, in fact, spend his childhood documenting his family’s
lives. Ever the lazy pop culture
scholar, I didn’t know this when I watched the first two episodes and the pre-credit
video footage isn’t consistently present so it may not have appeared in the
first episodes I watched (or, ever the lazy DVR fast forwarder also, I may have
missed it). But I first became aware of
this connection when I saw one of these pre-credit videos on my second go at
the show. For example, after an episode
about the father, Murray, a short video ran featuring the video of Goldlberg’s
real father; after an episode about the new family, the Kremps, who moved to
the block, real footage of Chad Kremp, Adam’s childhood best friend is seen;
after an episode about experiences at the local video store, shots of the
exterior of a Hollywood Video is seen with the epitaph reading “In Loving
Memory of the Video Store, 1980-2013.” I
now eagerly wait for this scene before the credits because it makes for the
perfect double dose of nostalgia at the episode’s close: the sentimental end of the fictional
narrative and the sentimental tribute to the family interactions that inspired
it.
The show
also reminds me in a way of ABC’s The
Wonder Years (1988-1993), the coming of age sitcom that followed Kevin
Arnold (Fred Savage) through the late 60s and into the 70s. While
the distance between these two nostalgia shows are a bit different (The Wonder Years was always looking back
exactly 20 years and The Goldbergs is
now transporting viewers back in time almost 30 years), the effect is pretty similar. The
Goldbergs lacks the subtle political commentary present in The Wonder Years (Kevin’s father works
for a defense contractor during this cold war era and his love interest’s
brother is killed in Vietnam in the very first episode), but the underlying
longing for a simpler time (historically and developmentally) is shared by
both. In a way they are both love
stories, not in the traditional sense, but love stories about childhood.
In
making the connection between these two shows, I was drawn to review how the
ancestor show, The Wonder Years, ended. (Thanks Wikipedia
for always being a source of ever-so-available information):
The final sounds, voice-over narration, and dialogue of the series
is that of the adult Kevin (voice of Daniel Stern), with children heard in the
background: “Growing up happens in a
heartbeat. One day you're in diapers, the next day you're gone. But the
memories of childhood stay with you for the long haul. I remember a place, a
town, a house, like a lot of houses. A yard like a lot of other yards. On a
street like a lot of other streets. And the thing is, after all these years, I
still look back... with wonder.” A
little boy (Stern's real life son) can be heard asking his dad to come out and
play catch during a break in the final narration. Kevin's narrative responds,
"I'll be right there" as the episode closes.
Just
re-reading that scene pulled at a heart-string and I realized that shows like
this appeal to me because they look back on childhood through the rose-colored
glasses that I long to look through when remembering my own childhood through
aging photographs, diaries, and keepsakes.
They show the sunny side of childhood, the type I long to give to my
little girls, and cast off the shadowy parts (at least by the episode or series
close). What do I get in watching them? A chance to smile slightly, murmur an “awe,” and remember ever so vaguely the
wonder that was my own childhood.
I never got into The Wonder Years, but I've really enjoyed The Goldbergs: the crazy mom, the emotionally distant Dad, the doofus older brother ("Flavor Flav is the only one who understands me!"), the sister who is trying to figure out who she is. One of my daughter and my favorite scenes from one of the middle episodes is when Adam has the hots for the girl down the street, and the girl comes by and Adam something something dumb like, "Yeh, bikes ... fun." Then he breaks her bike chain. Later on Adam tries to redeem himself by going all Say Anything.
ReplyDeleteIn other words, the Nasty family members are big fans of the show.
But it stands to reason that TV is capitalizing on the 80s because we thirty and fortysomethings look back with nostalgia about our childhoods and/or years of adolescence. Since I graduated high school in 1989, this show certainly appeals.
The show The Americans also plays on 80s nostaglia in a slight way.
QBN, I think the older brother definitely gets the most laughs from his impressive basketball skills to his talent show performing Ka-RA-te moves. The Say Anything allusion was classic though.
DeleteThere is a definite move to cater to us 30/40-somethings at the moment with this nostalgia wave (ABC ran a mini-series just recently that was a rip off of The Americans). But this tactic was glaringly obvious when I flipped through merchandise catalogs around the holidays. They were reviving all the 80s toys: Fisher Price TVs and Record Players, Raggedy Ann and Andy Dolls, etc. I was tempted to buy them (and still am) but know full well that they will not dazzle my kids -- I'll really be buying them for me.
Next time I stop by your office, I'll look for your Rubik's Cube.
ReplyDelete