Every
television season it’s fun to watch the new hot televisual trend and see if it’s
going to be a success or a flop. This
year the experiment was the rom-sitcom:
the hybrid genre that results when you try to blend the characteristics
of the romantic comedy with that of the sitcom.
In
theory this merger appealed to me. As a
fan of the serial format, I find myself much more invested in characters and
relationships that evolve over the time allotted from a long-lasting series in
comparison to a two-hour filmic installation.
And, as a forever-flawed feminist, I am also oddly drawn to romantic
comedies despite their predictable plots, stock characters, stereotypical
gender portrayals, and unflinching endorsement of heteronormativity. I was curious to see how this systematic
combination would work on the small screen.
It didn’t take me long to realize it wouldn’t. It didn’t take the networks long either. Take for example the early cancelations of NBC’s
Manhattan Love Story and CBS’s A to Z.
Manhattan Love Story followed the typical romantic
comedy formula: a meet cute that leads
to seeming opposites falling into an unlikely courtship. Following in the tradition of romantic
comedies (like almost any film staring Katherine Heigl), the show featured a
crass, womanizing male protagonist and an uptight, naïve female
protagonist. Bad acting and writing
aside, I decided early on that while I can often stomach such problematic
recurring characters for the duration of a 90-minute Hollywood film, the idea of tuning in to watch such
characterizations play out endlessly week after week in 30 minute intervals was
not appealing.
A to Z had a slightly more enjoyable
premise. The opening voice over announces:
“Andrew and Zelda date for eight months,
three weeks, five days, and one hour. This television program is the
comprehensive account of their relationship.” On the surface the show seemed to have a
set-up that could replace that of the recently vacated How I Met Your Mother:
viewers are presented with a known end point that they are watching to
arrive at but do not know what that end point actually is: dating that ends in a break up or a
marriage. Despite being mildly
interested in the premise, like many other viewers apparently, I didn’t tune in
past the pilot episode.
In the midst of all these shows, I found myself drawn to only
one new sitcom that debuted this season:
ABC’s Selfie. While others grouped the show with these
others in the category of rom-sitcom because it included a potential romantic
pairing between the two leads (but what sitcom doesn’t do this usually?), I
felt it was simply a new workplace sitcom carrying out some interesting social
commentary. The show starred Karen Gillan as Eliza
Dooley, a social media obsessed, narcissistic fame junkie who ultimately seeks
guidance for self-improvement from her colleague, Henry Higgs (played by John
Cho), a marketing image guru. Although
necessarily hyperbolic, the show provided some over-the-top social commentary
on our cultural addiction with technology and social networking. Although played for laughs, the show
transformed the real findings of researchers into little vignettes to allow
viewers to ponder the impact of these trends on our lives. For example, the show included storylines
about how identity performance plays out in online spaces and how those
carefully constructed projections lead to feelings of inadequacy and jealousy
when people compare their real lives to those constructions. It explored how social networking has
resulted in the devaluing of real face-to-face friendships, replacing such practices
with that of collecting of online friends as accessories and evidence of social
capital. It addressed how social media
is changing the ways in which we start, maintain, and end relationships. And it hinted at the concerns of living in an
era wherein all of our movements are forever recorded in the ever expansive
cloud.
While it’s silliest (and perhaps
funniest) moments came in the form of replaying the very real social media missteps
that many viewers have experienced in real life (for example when Henry becomes
addicted to cyber stalking his ex-girlfriends through Facebook and accidentally
ends up tagging himself in a picture of one who was breastfeeding her newborn),
the most heartfelt moments came when the show addressed the ways in which our
ever-connected lifestyles actually lead to more loneliness than ever
before. (An issue well covered in
scholarly endeavors, such as Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together: Why We Expect
More from Technology and Less from Each Other). However, what I really enjoyed about the show
is that it didn’t rest on the reductive premise that loneliness stems from this
cultural phenomenon alone. The show
systematically juxtaposes scenes that highlight Eliza’s lack of interpersonal
skills with those that showcase Henry’s (usually) unfaltering success in social
situations. But then it reveals that
both are equally lonely. The social
networking addict and the social networking abstainer both are lacking in
meaningful friendships and romantic relationships, although they start to gain
both through their encounters with one another.
My favorite moment from the series was the scene in which Henry – who is
tasked with improving Eliza’s public image and poor social habits – abandons his
goal of getting her to stop eating her lunch standing over the garbage can once
she reveals that it was an old habit developed to make it seem like she was too
busy to sit down and eat when really it was because as a young girl she had no
friends to sit down and eat beside.
Learning this, Henry instead joins her to eat his own lunch standing
beside her over a garbage can in his office.
I liked the inclusion of this theme of loneliness in the show as it
showed that this emotion is a time honored experience common to human
experience… and not just to humans participating in the social networking
era. This little motif added a little
nuance to a show that could be read as beating us over the head with jokes
about our technology addiction and social communication practices.
But maybe the jokes seemed too overdone and they over-powered
what I thought to be great acting and pretty good chemistry between Gillan and
Cho. Or maybe Selfie’s downfall was being grouped with the aforementioned sitcoms
as being just another of the over-done romantic comedy shows that debuted this
Fall. Perhaps if it has debuted without
the others the series would not have found itself arriving at the same
destination: cancelation.
But, maybe it would have.
Maybe viewers aren’t interested in a show that gets them to think
critically about their most common social practices. Maybe some of the jokes hit too close to
home.
No comments:
Post a Comment